Mental health in the music business is an occupational health crisis hiding in plain sight, with suicide risk, depression, and anxiety rates that would set off alarms in any hospital system or Fortune 500 boardroom. That same industry is also experimenting with some of the most innovative peer-support and prevention models, offering lessons for healthcare leaders trying to reach other precarious, gig-based workforces.
A High-Risk Job
The emerging epidemiology is quite clear. Musicians and music workers sit among the highest-risk occupational groups for suicide in both the US and UK. In England, those working as musicians, actors, and entertainers have suicide rates 20 percent higher than the male average and 69 percent higher than the female average, placing them in the top tier of at‑risk professions. In US data, musicians, singers, and related workers have recorded suicide rates above 130 deaths per 100,000, among the very highest of any major occupation category.
Behind those outcomes is a well-documented burden of mental illness and suicidality across the broader entertainment workforce. One Australian study found lifetime suicidal ideation among entertainment professionals, many of them music workers, to be more than six times higher than the general population. Recent research on touring professionals and artists in the US estimated suicidality levels more than five times higher than the national average.
It’s not just the stars on stage suffering.
Depression, Anxiety, and the Touring Grind
Rates of depression and anxiety among musicians track significantly above those of the general workforce, with multiple studies from Europe and Scandinavia finding higher symptom levels, more self‑reported diagnoses, and greater use of psychotherapy and psychotropic medications.
Among Norwegian music and arts students, for example, self‑reported mental disorders and therapy use exceed those of other students, mirroring disparities seen later in professional life. A survey of working musicians has found that roughly one in six reported at least one prior suicide attempt, a figure that would be alarming in any clinical population.
From Awareness to Prevention Models
In response, a new ecosystem of music-focused mental health initiatives has begun to take shape, often ahead of what traditional employer systems have offered. Organizations in the US, UK, and Australia have launched music‑specific helplines, subsidized counselling, and peer support groups tailored to touring professionals and gig workers.
Early evaluations of peer support in similar creative communities suggest these groups can improve mental health and quality of life, particularly when participants share occupational experiences and social identity.
On the clinical side, experts are starting to adapt the Zero Suicide Framework, a seven‑element systems approach first developed in healthcare, for musicians and music companies. Proposed adaptations include industry‑wide gatekeeper training for managers and crew, proactive screening for suicide risk among touring staff, and explicit “warm handoff” protocols so that artists can maintain therapeutic relationships while on the road.
For healthcare leaders watching from adjacent sectors, the music industry has become a live laboratory for deploying population‑level suicide prevention in fragmented, contractor-heavy workforces.
Building Safer Systems and Unexpected Allies
That is where professionals like Christopher J. Smith are making headway. His career blends arts-based community work, storytelling, and public safety and rehabilitation experience. Smith currently serves as vice president of benefits and wellbeing at Universal Music Group.
His experience spans community documentation projects and high‑stakes safety and recovery work and mirrors the kind of cross‑sector expertise mental health advocates in music say they need more of, people who understand both the creative value of touring arts communities and the operational disciplines of risk management and care coordination.
When a sector builds its core business on gig work, emotional labor, and relentless public scrutiny, mental health can no longer be treated as an individual resilience issue. It becomes a system quality problem, measurable and preventable in many of the same ways as hospital-acquired infections or wrong‑site surgeries.
In that sense, the music industry’s reckoning is also an invitation to apply occupational-health thinking, data-driven suicide prevention models, and cross‑disciplinary leaders like Smith to any field where the show must go on, even when the people behind it are quietly falling apart.
Cancer remains a top challenge for employers, for the deep personal toll it takes on the workforce, and the costs driven by treatment, especially for late stage diagnoses. Current solutions have largely failed to address these challenges. Color offers employers a new way to provide better cancer care, while heavily reducing the cost burden. Step one is focusing on early detection. This is the biggest lever on costs and outcomes – the cost of treating an early-stage cancer is 8x lower, and has 90%+ survival rate. Next is realizing cancer is a complex clinical problem requiring oncologist led care, not just navigation. Lastly, employers need a partner that is accountable for changing the outcomes and the reduction in costs, and measures progress accordingly.
